Are Students Banks or People?How to best educate students is an interesting question, and one we will be examining for the next couple of weeks. An educator named Paulo
Freire wrote a book entitled
The Pedagogy of the Oppressed in which he discusses this topic. In his second chapter, he sets forth two methods of educating. I have experienced both during my life.
In my senior year of high school I took Chinese at a community college. Understandably, most of what we students had to do was memorize vocabulary words. This idea of students being passive receivers/memorizers is what Freire refers to as the "banking concept." The teachers are in total control of the situation, and they are often seen as knowing everything about their subject. They make "deposits" of knowledge into the "banks" (students). Students are supposed to meekly accept, swallow, and parrot whatever the teacher says. This method is almost unavoidable in a foreign language class. When it is employed in other classes (history, for example), however, Freire says that it "minimize[s] or annul[s] the students' creative power" (73) and serves to make them less human.
The English 2 honors class I took last semester was in stark contrast to the banking model. Although the professor did sometimes lecture about what we were reading, she mostly encouraged us to discuss what we had noticed in the texts. This is what Freire calls the "problem posing" method of education. This method focuses on "acts of cognition, not transferrals of information," Freire says (79). It also means that the teacher becomes more of a fellow student - someone who can gain just as much from the class as the "real" students do. "Problem posing" forces students to think things through rather than be spoonfed all the answers.
Clearly, the latter method is preferable.